<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voices | Elise Jones | Activity</title>
	<link>https://voices.wooster.edu/members/ejones/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://voices.wooster.edu/members/ejones/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Elise Jones.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 03:49:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">03069347b36535f1af2696109e6fa509</guid>
				<title>Elise Jones commented on the post, Constraints are the Key to Differentiating IR Theories, on the site &#034;What&#039;s Latin for Roman?&#034;</title>
				<link>https://theoriesofir.voices.wooster.edu/2022/09/27/constraints-are-the-key-to-differentiating-ir-theories/#comment-2</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:09:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recognition of the constraints is super important to understanding the drawbacks of each  theory and the targeted understanding provided by each. I do think that constructivism is very loose, but I do think that [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">74d767ebf6c5efeb7013f13cbb143f9d</guid>
				<title>Elise Jones wrote a new post on the site Theories in International Relations</title>
				<link>https://beetlesandbugs.voices.wooster.edu/?p=6</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:47:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two major camps of research frameworks, as understood by Hollis and Smith (1992), are outlined as the “outside story” or explanatory research, and the “inside story” or understanding research.  These two camps ar [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c0fb896233517c9c5c54feaf805a5b8b</guid>
				<title>Elise Jones wrote a new post on the site Theories in International Relations</title>
				<link>https://beetlesandbugs.voices.wooster.edu/?p=3</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 18:35:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My name is Elise Jones and I am a Global and International Studies major in Political Science and a Spanish minor.  I am primarily interested in theoretical stability of autocratic governments and its [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9d492d32e55cd4b416d9bc51f10595c4</guid>
				<title>Elise Jones became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://voices.wooster.edu/activity/p/12924/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:59:03 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>